---
title: Trust, Rule of Law, and the Size Premium: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis
url: https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2609.26212/
site: ML-Quant (https://www.ml-quant.com)
updated: 2026-09-26
license: Summaries CC BY 4.0; links go to the original sources
index: https://www.ml-quant.com/llms.txt
identifier: arXiv:2609.26212
source_url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26212
featured: 2026-09-25
citations: 0
topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
---


# Trust, Rule of Law, and the Size Premium: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of 1,613 size-premium estimates across 31 countries finds that stronger rule of law is associated with larger size premia, contrary to intuition.

- Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26212
- Identifier: arXiv:2609.26212
- Released: 2026-09-23
- First featured: Quant Letter No. 132 (2026-09-25): https://www.ml-quant.com/issues/2026-09-25/
- Citations (Semantic Scholar): 0
- Published in: not yet
- Topic: Asset Pricing & Factors
- Authors: Jiri Schwarz, Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova, Jiri Novak

## Abstract (arXiv, CC0)

Reported estimates of the size premium, the tendency of smaller firms to earn higher average returns than larger firms, vary widely across studies, countries, periods, and designs. We examine whether generalized trust and rule of law help account for that heterogeneity. Small firms are more opaque and more dependent on outside finance, so the enforcement and information environment should matter more for them than for large firms. We study 1,613 reported size-slope estimates from 105 studies and 31 countries. The meta-regressions control for study design, specification, precision, publication context, and market and macro-financial conditions; Bayesian model averaging assesses uncertainty over the control set. The more stable association is with rule of law, and it runs against the intuitive expectation that better legal institutions shrink the premium: stronger rule of law is associated with more negative reported size slopes, hence larger conventional size premia. The trust association is conditional and less precisely estimated: where rule of law is weak, higher generalized trust is linked to less negative reported slopes (and thus a weaker premium), and this link fades as rule of law strengthens. Formal and informal institutions thus help organize part of the disagreement in this literature, although the analysis concerns variation in reported estimates and does not identify causal effects.

## Related

- [Interpretable Machine Learning for Asset Pricing](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4473746/): The paper utilizes deep neural networks to more accurately estimate equity risk premia over time, enhancing the interpretability of machine learning in economics.
- [The Cross-Section of Factor Returns](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/4441376/): Most of the 150 equity factors examined show positive returns but fail to deliver excess returns after accounting for risk, especially in downturns.
- [Are Penalty Shootouts Better Than a Coin Toss? Evidence From International Club Football in Europe](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2510.17641/): Using UEFA penalty shootout data (2000–2025) we find outcomes are essentially random—no measurable advantage from kicking order, venue, momentum, or team strength.
- [Optimal Investment and Consumption in a Stochastic Factor Model](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2509.09452/): The article discusses optimal investment and consumption in an incomplete stochastic factor model, offering a comprehensive characterization of the problem's well-posedness and an efficient numerical algorithm for computing the value function.
- [Model complexity and the performance of global versus regional models](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/ssrn/5241880/): Complex algorithms in global models outperform regional models in cross-sectional asset pricing, contradicting previous studies favoring regional methods.
- [How Election Shocks Impact Markets: Evidence from Sectoral Stock Prices](https://www.ml-quant.com/papers/arxiv/2504.02731/): Research indicates U.S. presidential election cycles impact sectoral stock markets, with candidate preferences influencing asset prices in energy, defense, and clean energy sectors.